Why Transit Agencies Should Avoid Cutting Bus Services

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Why Transit Agencies Should Avoid Cutting Bus Services

Keep up with the latest from ccr-mag.us

Fill out the form Below

As transit agencies and municipal mobility planners deal with budget shortfalls and mounting fiscal pressures, the temptation to cut transit bus service can seem like an expedient solution. However, this approach is not only shortsighted but risks undermining the very economic, social, and environmental goals that public transit is meant to advance.

A closer look at ridership trends, demographic shifts, and the broader impacts of service reductions reveals why maintaining-and even improving-bus service levels should be a top priority in 2025.

The Real Cost of Service Cuts

Recent warnings from major transit agencies underscore the dire consequences of slashing service. In Chicago, proposed cuts could eliminate up to 74 of 127 bus routes, end all weekend bus service on some lines, and reduce paratransit by as much as 66%. Pittsburgh faces a 35% reduction in service and fare hikes exceeding 9% if new funding is not secured, with officials warning that “there is nothing left to cut from the budget but service”. In Metro Vancouver, halving bus service would leave more than half a million people without convenient access to transit, exacerbating congestion and stalling economic activity.

These scenarios are not unique. Across North America, agencies are sounding the alarm: once service is cut, it can take a decade or more to rebuild ridership and restore lost routes. The impact is not limited to lower-income riders; it ripples through the entire economy, affecting employers, businesses, and the region’s competitiveness.

Changing Ridership Demographics

The profile of the typical transit rider is evolving. While bus service has long been a lifeline for lower-income communities, recent surveys and ridership data show that a broader cross-section of the population is relying on transit. For instance, the Valley Transportation Authority (VTA) in San Jose found through its onboard surveys that ridership is diversifying, with more young professionals, students, and service-sector workers using buses. This shift reflects changing urban living patterns and a growing preference for sustainable mobility options.

Moreover, agencies like Portland’s TriMet and San Jose’s VTA have reported increases in bus ridership following targeted improvements in service reliability and frequency. These gains are especially notable given the challenges posed by the pandemic and changing commuting patterns. The lesson is clear: people respond positively to better service, and the benefits extend well beyond traditional demographics.

Improved Service Drives Ridership

Investing in service quality-not just new vehicles or flashy ribbon-cutting ceremonies-has proven to be the most effective way to grow ridership. While new buses and stations are important, they do not, on their own, attract new riders. What matters most is reliability: buses that arrive on time and at predictable intervals. Agencies that have focused on improving on-time performance and streamlining schedules have seen measurable increases in ridership, often without having to add more vehicles to the road.

Better on-time performance means agencies can do more with less. By optimizing schedules and reducing delays, it is possible to maintain or even expand service coverage without incurring the costs of additional buses or operators. This approach is both fiscally responsible and responsive to the needs of riders, who value dependability above all else.

The Broader Impact of Service Cuts

Cutting bus service is not just a blow to mobility for lower-income residents-it is a setback for the entire community. Service reductions disproportionately affect shift workers, seniors, students, and people with disabilities, but they also undermine economic growth, increase congestion, and worsen air quality. In regions facing service cuts, employers in healthcare, hospitality, and other essential sectors report difficulty retaining workers who can no longer rely on transit. The loss of mobility options can also drive up household transportation costs, increase car dependency, and erode the tax base as people and businesses relocate to more accessible areas.

Microtransit and Technology: Not a Panacea

While microtransit and other on-demand solutions are gaining attention, they are not a substitute for robust, frequent fixed-route bus service. Agencies consistently report that what riders want most is reliable, frequent service on existing routes-not experimental pilot programs or niche services. Technology can and should be leveraged to improve scheduling, real-time information, and fare collection, but the core of any successful transit system remains a strong network of well-operated bus lines.

Funding Uncertainty and the Need for Advocacy

Tariffs, inflation, and unpredictable federal and state funding streams add further complexity to transit agency budgets, making long-term planning difficult. This uncertainty should not be used as justification for service cuts. Instead, it highlights the urgent need for advocacy and coalition-building among agencies, municipalities, and the public to secure sustainable funding models. Agencies must communicate the real-world impacts of service reductions and work with stakeholders to prioritize transit as an essential public good.

Elevating Service, Not Cutting It

Transit agencies know that service cuts are a last resort-one that risks irreversible damage to mobility, equity, and economic vitality. The evidence is clear: improved service levels drive ridership, support changing demographics, and deliver far-reaching benefits that

extend well beyond traditional transit-dependent populations. As agencies confront fiscal challenges, the focus should be on optimizing operations, advocating for stable funding, and delivering the reliable, frequent service that communities need to thrive. Cutting bus service may offer short-term budget relief, but it comes at a steep and lasting cost. The path to a vibrant, resilient transit future lies in elevating service-not reducing it.

About The Author:

Laramie Bowron is Vice President of Sales for LYT, provider of cloud-based open-architecture smart traffic solutions. LYT makes traffic lights smart by enabling them to see and respond to traffic. By doing so LYT can prioritize first responders and public transportation vehicles so they can get to their destinations faster and safer. The additional benefit is that it streamlines overall traffic flow helping to reduce congestion and emissions in high traffic areas. Learn more here.

Events

Read more BELOW

News
Supplements/Podcast
See Website for Details

This content (including text, artwork, graphics, photography, and video) was provided by the third party(ies) as referenced above. Any rights or other content questions or inquiries should be directed such third-party provider(s).

Receive the CCR 2024 Idustry Report

Get ahead of your Competitors with CCR's FREE Industry Insider's Report 2024!

Always stay two steps ahead of your Competitors. Stay informed with the latest in the Industry. 

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

This site uses cookies to ensure that you get the best user experience. By choosing “Accept” you acknowledge this and that ccr-mag.us operates under the Fair Use Act. Furthermore, Changing privacy laws now require website visitors from EEA based countries to provide consent in order to use personalized advertising or data modeling with either Google Ads & Analytics. Find out more on the Privacy Policy & Terms of Use Page